Finally finished reading Madhorubaagan
by Perumal Murugan (‘One Part Woman’ in English). Yes, the Tamil book for which
Perumal suffered a stinging smear campaign that hit the national headlines. It set the nation’s conscience on fire and its
self-ordained conscience keeper(s) ‘wanted to know’ if the freedom of speech and
expression that the Indian Constitution granted its every citizen remained an
unfulfilled dream.
An avoidable and unfortunate episode that Perumal agonisingly admitted, ‘killed the writer in him’!
(Here's an article in the Caravan magazine that gives a good review of book and the controversy surrounding it.)
An avoidable and unfortunate episode that Perumal agonisingly admitted, ‘killed the writer in him’!
(Here's an article in the Caravan magazine that gives a good review of book and the controversy surrounding it.)
Four years after its publication in Tamil and an English
translation later, a caste-based group in Namakkal (a small town in south Tamil
Nadu) suddenly woke up to the contents of the book and accused the author of hurting
the sentiments of their community. The group threatened him to withdraw his work from the
public domain and burned copies of his book in public.
So, why was Perumal’s work catapulted into a cauldron of controversy?
Based on his research of oral traditions, the author states that a century back, there was a practice in the areas around Thiruchengodu (a temple town in Namakkal district) whereby a woman, on failing to mother a child through her husband, could bear a child through consensual sex with another man, a stranger, on the 14th day of the car festival of the local temple. A child born through such an union would be accepted by the woman’s husband and his family as a child of the God.
Based on his research of oral traditions, the author states that a century back, there was a practice in the areas around Thiruchengodu (a temple town in Namakkal district) whereby a woman, on failing to mother a child through her husband, could bear a child through consensual sex with another man, a stranger, on the 14th day of the car festival of the local temple. A child born through such an union would be accepted by the woman’s husband and his family as a child of the God.
Set in the cultural milieu of the early twentieth century, Madhorubagan is the story of one such
loving ,but childless couple, Kali (husband) and Ponna (wife). Twelve years into marriage and stung by the repeated
taunts and cruel words of the other villagers on her inability to bear an offspring,
Ponna decides to take the last resort to give Kali a child.
It was this concept of consensual sex or niyoga that was at the crux of the controversy, with the protestors claiming that it showed women in bad light and was trying to
‘basxxxxise’ their community.
But is it really as blasphemous as it is made out to be?
But is it really as blasphemous as it is made out to be?
In defence of Ponna and Perumal
Niyoga is not new
to our society.
It is common knowledge that it finds mention in the Mahabharatha. Some of the key characters
in the epic – Karna, his brothers, the Pandavas, their father Pandu, and his brother Dhridharashtra – were
conceived in this manner. (In fact, the Mahabharatha is replete with examples of extraordinary births including those of Drona – who was conceived in a pot from Sage Bharadvaja’s semen , Kripa & Kripi – who were born among river reeds as a result of joyous ejaculation by Muni Sharadwan, Jarasandha – the evil king who was born in two halves to two mothers, the Kauravas- who were cut out from a lump of dead flesh their mother Gandhari delivered, and Dhristadyumna and Draupadi, who emerged from the sacrificial fire.)
Now, we could either choose to accuse Sage Veda Vyasa (or Perumal
Murugan as in this case) of being a pervert, or we could celebrate
him for his unparalleled imagination and his empathetic approach to human
frailties. So, what is our pick?
I think the answer lies in understanding
the importance fertility and child-bearing have been given in our traditionally
agrarian society.
Right from the days of the Indus Valley (or Indo Sarasvathi) Civilisation, Indians have
expressed their awe of the life giving capacity of a woman. (Seals that depict a
tree growing out of a woman’s womb have been unearthed in these sites.) Celebration
of a woman’s fertility has thus remained an integral part of our culture
through the ages. Even today, in most parts of India, puberty is a much-awaited
milestone in a girl’s life and an occasion for grand celebrations among
families.
Our fascination with procreation doesn’t stop there. Marriage
ceremonies in this country are replete with fertility rituals and symbols. A
simple thing as the ‘sindoor’ that the husband applies to his wife’s forehead, is
one such explicit symbol, the colour red denoting fertility. <Reference: Fertility
rituals in Hinduism>.
According to ancient Indian astrology, ‘bahuputra
yogam’ or the fortune to bear many children was a key desirable in a woman.
Conversely, inability to bear more children is also one of the reasons why a widow’s status
is low in the socio-cultural hierarchy.
It turns out that ours is the only culture other than ancient Greece, where Gods are associated with
sexuality, and also bear progeny. Lingam signifying the male creative power is
manifested in the form of Shiva and the Yoni representing the female creative
power is manifested as Shakthi in the Hindu pantheon. In the Kamakhya temple in
Guwahati, Assam, the Goddess appears in the form of Yoni, the female genital through
which all living beings enter this world. In what is celebrated as ambubachi mela, this
temple actually shuts down for three days in a year, when the Goddess is believed
to be menstruating and needs her privacy.
Even the presiding deity of Thiruchengode temple, after
whom Perumal’s book is titled (Ardhanarishwara
translates into Madhorubagan in
Tamil), is a composite androgynous form of Shiva and Shakthi, a symbol
of the sacred union exalted as the root of all creation.
Moreover, unlike many other cultures, which dictate celibacy
for Godmen, ours actively propagated marriage and procreation, even among
the men of God. The story goes that the eminent sage Agastya once found some
men hanging upside down from a cliff on a high mountain. When he questioned
them on their pitiable condition, the sages replied that they were actually his
ancestors and were confined to this terrible fate because he, Agastya, had not
embraced Grihasthashrama, the life of
a householder. The sages requested Agastya to marry and beget sons, which was
the only way the reverend sage could fulfil his duties towards them.
Child-bearing has thus been considered an essential duty to be rendered by every member of our society.
And one compelling reason for the significance attached to progeny
and perpetuity in our society lies in our economy, and how it has evolved over the ages. Child-bearing has thus been considered an essential duty to be rendered by every member of our society.
Farming and trading, the twin arms of our economy, have
evolved as dynastic enterprises, which thrive on familial perpetuity. In an
agrarian society, land ownership passes from father to son. World over, societies have experimented with
practices of polyandry (one woman in a relationship with many men) and
polygamy (one man having a relationship with many women) with the intention of
preserving dynastic succession.
Polyandry is still reportedly prevalent among some tribals (Todars of
Ooty) in India, in parts of Nepal and even in some areas in India that border Nepal.
In my opinion, cognizance of this
social milieu alone can help us appreciate Ponna’s predicament in the story and
the solution her society offered her. To his credit, the author shows enormous
sensitivity in portraying the grief of the protagonists and what inability to
produce a progeny would have meant in an agrarian set-up.
The protestors apparently wanted
to hear none of this and confined themselves to questioning the wisdom in
unearthing what they thought were defunct practices. They couldn’t have been
more inaccurate!
Niyoga hasn’t disappeared from our society at all. It has only taken a new avatar - that of donor insemination.
So, in all fairness, if the protestors found this method of conception objectionable, then they should well be staging dharnas outside all those fertility clinics in Namakkal that provide this treatment. (BTW, do these purists know that India is the largest destination for surrogate tourism in the world?)
In any case, the protests have
only served to popularise the book. (I, for one, wouldn’t have read it
otherwise.) The controversy has actually helped unearth a hidden gem
in Perumal Murugan. Niyoga hasn’t disappeared from our society at all. It has only taken a new avatar - that of donor insemination.
So, in all fairness, if the protestors found this method of conception objectionable, then they should well be staging dharnas outside all those fertility clinics in Namakkal that provide this treatment. (BTW, do these purists know that India is the largest destination for surrogate tourism in the world?)
The verdict
It’s a ‘Must Read’, a fine work on a socially
relevant topic. Those who can’t relish it in its native language, go for its
English translation (One Part Woman). It is available with all online retailers.
(The author has also brought out two sequels to this book; waiting
to read them as well.)
BTW, wondering what, in heaven’s name, this blog has
to do with its title, borrowed from Dibakar Bannerjee’s 2010 Bollywood flick? Well,
I think these four words aptly capture Kali’s range of emotions in
this book :)
No comments:
Post a Comment